Review: The Hunger Games

The Hunger Games

  • Starring: Jennifer Lawrence (X-Men: First Class), Josh Hutcherson (Bridge to Terabithia), and Liam Hemsworth (The Last Song)
  • Directed by: Gary Ross
  • Synopsis: “Every year in the ruins of what was once North America, the evil Capitol of the nation of Panem forces each of its twelve districts to send a teenage boy and girl to compete in the Hunger Games. A twisted punishment for a past uprising and an ongoing government intimidation tactic, The Hunger Games are a nationally televised event in which “Tributes” must fight with one another until one survivor remains. Pitted against highly-trained Tributes who have prepared for these Games their entire lives, Katniss is forced to rely upon her sharp instincts as well as the mentorship of drunken former victor Haymitch Abernathy. If she’s ever to return home to District 12, Katniss must make impossible choices in the arena that weigh survival against humanity and life against love. THE HUNGER GAMES is directed by Gary Ross, and produced by Nina Jacobson’s Color Force in tandem with producer Jon Kilik. Suzanne Collins’ best-selling novel, the first in a trilogy published by Scholastic that has over 16 million copies in print in the United States alone, has developed a massive global following.” (Collider)
  • Rated: PG-13 for intense violent material involving teens
  • Trailer:

Back in July, I did a spotlight post on The Hunger Games (before it started getting tons of attention), and, to date, that post is still the Top Viewed post on my site. Once the post started getting a bunch of attention, I knew that The Hunger Games was going to be a big deal. “A Big Deal” is an understatement.

The best-seller book “The Hunger Games” finally makes its way to the big screen after much anticipation. And a big question for fans of the book series is: “How does it compare to the book? Is this going to be an epic book-to-movie translation? or is it going to be an epic disappointment?”

Well, I can’t answer that question for you. haha. I decided to not read the book until AFTER watching the movie. This decision was made mainly because I wanted to enjoy the movie for the first time as simply that…a movie (without trying to critique its interpretation of what was penned in the book). And I am glad I did so. No expectations to be met. But may I say, that many of my friends who had high expectations from reading the book prior also saw this as a fantastic adaptation.

That being said, here is my “non-comparison” review!

The Hunger Games begins with a very telling introduction into the world of the protagonist, Katniss Everdeen of District 12 of Panem. Immediately engrossing you into the film, there is hardly a moment that your attention will be drawn away. The Hunger Games truly keeps you hungry for each upcoming scene as the story unfolds.

There are several amazing elements that comprise this amazing film- Contributing contrasts; Fantastic cast/characters; High level mixture of action, drama, and suspense; and an impressive soundtrack. Here’s a quick look at just a few of these elements and how they worked to make this film a success. But the true strength that makes The Hunger Games a winner is the look/feel, the cast/characters, and the storytelling (riddled with foreboding events leading to the following films).

It is interesting to see the way in which the film paints the stark differences between the two worlds that Katniss embarks through. The cold and impoverished district she calls home versus the colorful, grandiose, and exciting Capitol of Panem is a telling contrast not too easily forgotten. It all adds to the believability of the environment, the events, and the characters.

Speaking of the characters, Wow! What characters! When doing my initial research on the film project, I learned a little bit of what to expect, but it was nowhere near how amazingly well done these characters are shown in the film. From Stanley Tucci and Elizabeth Banks as some of the best scene-stealers in cinematic history in their respective roles; to a rather subdued Woody Harrelson and Donald Sutherland; to Jennifer Lawrence’s flawless performance as Katniss Everdeen; it is the characters and their respective journeys that add an additional sense of awe and wonder to The Hunger Games.

Tucci’s larger-than-life portrayal of the exuberant host of the Hunger Games Caesar Flickerman is exciting and memorable! (One of his BEST roles!)

Banks’ primp and proper performance as Effie Trinket is another fine use of talent used to tell the story and embody the spirit of people in the Capitol! (Hardly recognizable as Banks!)

Harrelson played Haymitch Abernathy well, yet something still seemed lacking from his character! (Something I intend to look for in the book!)

Lawrence could not have done anything better to make Katniss a character worthy of our attention and emotion. For someone who got into acting without taking a single drama class for instruction in acting, Lawrence definitely proves she has what it takes to be believable in carrying the lead role for such an epic series. Her emotional performance will make you do nothing but cheer and feel for her plight! Cannot wait to see the follow-up films!

So many members of the rest of the cast sold their parts so well, no matter how small, that emotions will undoubtedly rise when events take place. Tears, sadness, anger, laughter, excitement, joy, awe, action, and wonder…all good words used to describe the experience you will have when watching The Hunger Games.

The story itself, while under scrutiny for plagiarism (look up the book/film Battle Royale), is one full of familiarity tied with originality. Love, war, power, corruption, self-discovery and acceptance, and more, there is something for every viewer to relate to when watching this film. It leaves you with a well-enough feeling of closure with enough openings leaving you with plenty to look forward to in the coming sequels.

Aside from a rather disconcerting shaky cam used in the first 15-20 minutes of the film (used no doubt to add to the contrast between the poverty-stricken District 12 and the never-wanting capitol), this film receives nothing but high praise from me. And, as far as the box-office is concerned, it looks as if “the odds may be ever in its favor!”

Score:  4 out of 5 stars for The Hunger Games

Thanks for reading! Happy Watching!

T, The Focused Filmographer


  1. *Possible Spoiler(s) Alert*

    I would personally give it a 3ish. There was little to no development in the film. They didn’t develop hardly any of the characters, romances, manipulations, friendships, etc. The only reason I slightly cared about any of the characters is because I had already bonded to them in the book. I mean seriously, you’re going to give Rue a total of 5 minutes of screen time in a 2.5 hour long movie? How am I supposed to bond to that? And she is just one of the several examples. The people themselves looked anything but hungry/starving/savage. I mean, did you see Gale’s hair? That’s way beyond some Master Cuts haircut. Overall, I felt the movie was entertaining, but it was nothing more than that. If I wanted to see a hallow-entertaining-survival-action movie I’d just watch “Surviving The Game” with Ice-T. But even then that film has better character development than “The Hunger Games”. I honestly feel a simple voice over would have helped with a lot of the film’s issues, but for all I know the studio or someone was against it.

    Overall, my biggest issue is that by the end of the film I could have cared less who lived or died.


    • that’s pretty sad that you could have cared less about them.

      thanks for sharing your perspective. You already know I disagree with you, but it was interesting to hear your thoughts. I felt that, yes, they could’ve shown more of Rue, but that didn’t keep me from liking her character and bonding, as you say, to her and her presence. The movie would’ve been far much longer if they did everything you suggest.

      I thought the snapshot of different characters was adequate. Quite appropriate I might add. But I can see where you might tend to feel as such. I am surprised to hear that you felt very little for the characters. Even with the book being written from Katniss’ point of view and the movie similarly following suit for the most part. As for the people, they did a good job showing the depravity and sadness of District 12. but, that’s just my perspective. Thanks for sharing yours!

      “Cared less who lived or died”…soul-less, just soul-less. hahaha


      • Obviously we have to agree to disagree. I wish I could say I was just being soulless. Unfortunately, I’m the same cat that cries at just about every movie I see (Hey, I LOVE good stories OK! lol). Sadly, It’s not me that’s soulless, it’s the characters. They had absolutely no depth. 2 minute’s per character was not enough for me to care about them. Even Katniss felt very hallow. That’s the main issue that could have been solved via voice-over while she’s… you know… sitting in a tree. That would have both helped development and added nothing to the time.

        All that said, I actually was surprised by Lenny Kravits’ performance. He can act better than a lot of people anticipated. Also, I liked Elisabeth Bank’s and Woody Harrelson. Now that I think about it, they did more development for the sideline characters than they did with any of the tributes lol.


      • I really think so. And honestly, I actually am not discouraged for the sequel. I think considering how the book is written it was a great effort. I just hope they can address some of the concerns that I had for the next film. Till next time!


  2. I sort of agree with Akka. Having read the books and comparing the character development between the movie and the books, the book obviously has the better development. Yeah, it would have been nice to see more of it in the movie, but I understand the reasons for not developing the characters more when there are two more movies to do this, plus my butt was starting to hurt towards the end of the movie… 🙂

    My wife and I really feel that this movie was made for people who have read the book and know some of the backstory. So if you are planning to go see it, take someone with you or read the book prior to going. However, having said this we agree with the rating TFF gave the movie. Cheers!


    • Yes, it was a longer movie (hooray for getting our money’s worth) and developing each character would have made it waaaay too long. Perhaps there is a greater sense of future planning for the sequels in this category than we thought! There are 2 more movies wherewith they can develop even more of the characters.

      I don’t know that I could say this film was made for people “who have read the book and know some of the backstory” though. Granted, I knew the backstory before seeing it, but I keep seeing several responses online from people that haven’t read the book or know any backstory that really enjoyed it. No doubt, it is even highly more enjoyed by those who do know the backstory though. On that I will agree.

      Glad that you and I agree on score. But I’d have to decline on seeing it with someone who has read the book prior if they plan on talking about every little thing and explaining it during the movie…that would frustrate me to no end. haha


  3. I’ve read the first two books as well, but perhaps they did as much as they could with this for a movie. Rue was woefully underused and I remember crying while reading the book where here I was just a little upset. The film does a fine job of capturing the most memorable parts of the book.

    What scarred me more than anything in the movie was seeing the six year olds in the audience. I’m not even a parent and I would never let a child that young see this movie.


    • Rue was underused, but I’ll tell you, I almost cried during the film. Like you, I feel “they did as much as they could with this for a movie.” Looking forward to finishing the book.

      Yeah, I’m with you on the younger audiences there.


  4. I finally decided to watch it T 🙂
    not because I am intrigue by everyone’s good review, including yours, but because I want to see how SIMILAR it is to BATTLE ROYALE…and if it is THAT similar, you better stay away from my cruel review 😉
    I know how cruel I could be when comparing something (just read my review on The Shining)


  5. Great review – sounds like you really really enjoyed it!

    Sadly, I can’t say the same for myself. I thought it was enjoyable enough, but I wasn’t drawn into the world as much as you were. The characters were fine, though nothing about any of them really stood out. There wasn’t enough of an emphasis on the whys and the real cruelty of watching teenagers kill themselves just for fun and for a way of their government to keep control of the people.

    I haven’t read the books and glad I went into the film without reading them. So I could just judge the film on the merits of the film. I feel like I’m missing something. Almost everyone else in the world seems to have really, really enjoyed it!


    • Thank you Jaina. Yes, I did enjoy it very much. While several are mentioning a lack of development of characters and the whys and hows, I still found it to be sufficient for the experience and story I was hoping for. Like you, I am glad I watched it without reading the book for the same reason. But now, I look forward to reading the books.

      Thanks for poppin in. I will be sure to read your review here shortly.


  6. Good review, T! I envy your conciseness. I do want to see this but it didn’t happen this weekend, I’m hoping it will be possible next weekend. I had forgotten Stanley Tucci was in it, he is a known scene-stealer & one of my favorite actors.


  7. I think I’d rather read the books before I see this film. I’d like to see how the film likened to the book series. You seem to have enjoyed it enormously! After the last few movies you have seen recently, this sounds like a huge relief for you to see!


    • Well, I def can’t wait to see your thoughts. I am starting the book. Perhaps we can read through the series together…although you will prob beat me to the end.

      and, you’re right. man, the quality of movies as of late…I was so relieved to watch a good one!


  8. Woo hoo! I refrain from reading your review until I’m done w/ mine and I’m glad we agree w/ our rating. I definitely look forward to the sequels!


  9. This movie was so well written and played out I went and purchased the book the next day. We tapped on the same comments concerning Lawrences performance (perfect fit), as well as Tucci & Banks. The love story was getting a bit annoying for me by the end of the film. But overall I wasn’t disappointed. You Have to see The Raid:Redemption…


    • Ooh, you got to see The Raid? It was only in about 14 screens this past weekend…Lucky!! I want to see it quite a bit! I will have to meander over to your page and read your thoughts. I’m behind on your reviews.

      Glad you liked The Hunger Games.


      • Ill wait for you to read my review and see what I thought about Raid. Won’t post my opinion here…lol. Is it going to be in your area anytime soon. Last wknd was a limited relased. They have to release it in more theatres because it sold out where I was at.

        Yes enjoyed Hunger Games…now Im reading the book, and only read the 1st chapter and Im hooked. So far the movie adaption is on point, and Jennifer Lawrence totally embodies her character in the book.


  10. Great review, T!

    I thought you wrote a really balanced review and inspired a lot of comments.

    I went into ‘The Hunger Games’ without knowing of the book series or seeing a trailer, I went because the basic outline interested me. So I didn’t really have a lot of preconceived ideas about the characters or stories, and as such, I really enjoyed the film.

    I thought that Jennifer Lawrence was wonderful in her role, really strong and independent, and out-acted Josh Hutcherson off the screen. I loved the supporting “adult” cast of Stanley Tucci, Woody Harrelson, and Elizabeth Banks.

    My major gripe was with the handy-cam feel and action scenes being filmed too close so that it made it hard to focus, however I enjoyed the film, and do look forward to the sequels.


    • Thank you for your kind words.

      I am now reading the book and have an even greater appreciation for the movie.

      Your gripe with the film was mine as well, and, I’ll tell ya, I don’t really understand why so many people are seeming to love Josh Hutcherson. He really wasn’t all that great to me.


      Loved the movie! Thanks.


  11. I really enjoyed it. I haven’t read the books, I always enjoy a book-based film more if I haven’t read it. I saw the first two Dragon Tattoo films, really enjoyed them; then I read the books and didn’t enjoy the final film so much.

    I think I came out of the film having wanted more closure on some of the story-lines, but this was before I realised that it would be a trilogy, so I’m looking forward to more to come.


    • Russell! Thank you for stopping in and commenting. Sorry I missed your comment earlier.

      I am glad that you liked the movie too. It’s a sign of a good movie sometimes when it leaves you wanting more and looking forward to the continuations.


  12. […] The Hunger Games- The best-selling first book of the enjoyed series continues its journey from book to big screen to blu-ray! Watch as Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) fights against all odds in a fight for her life, her family, her friends, and herself. With such a great supporting cast, including the likes of Stanley Tucci, Elizabeth Banks, Woody Harrelson, and more, be sure to pick up your copy of The Hunger Games later this week. In the meantime, check out my review HERE. […]


Psst!! Join in! Leave a Comment!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s