Skip to content

Review: World War Z

June 22, 2013

worldwzWorld War Z

  • Starring: Brad Pitt (Babel), Mireille Enos (Gangster Squad), James Badge Dale (The Grey) and more.
  • Directed by: Marc Forster (Quantum of Solace)
  • Synopsis: “The story revolves around United Nations employee Gerry Lane (Pitt), who traverses the world in a race against time to stop the Zombie pandemic that is toppling armies and governments and threatening to decimate humanity itself.”
  • Rated: Rated PG-13 for disturbing sequences/images, violence and frightening zombie scenes.
  • Must-Watch Trailer:
  • Review:

The undead have never gone out of fashion it seems in media. From Frankenstein to Night of the Living Dead to Dawn of the Dead and more, the undead in form of vampires, zombies, stitched together monsters and otherwise have caused thrills, shrieks, tears and screams for countless fans over the years. Hit the jump to see if it’s worth fighting to see World War Z.World_War_Z_Rio_Banner_5_31_13

worldwarz

Apparently similar yet quite different from the 2006 Max Brooks horror novel on which it is based, World War Z stars Brad Pitt in a passion project of his that takes a unique, and at the same time familiar, look at an apocalyptic threat of zombies. The trailers never had me sold on the film (fast moving zombies? ball of speedy CGI mess of faces and appendages moving like a wave? Brad Pitt a family man?) and so I went in with low expectations of this film.wwz5

Those low expectations paid off, but weren’t completely necessary as World War Z is a decent summer flick that surprised me. Full of aspects that tend to be borrowed from 28 Days Later, Contagion and the Xbox game “Left For Dead,” World War Z brings on the frights through the fictional reality a zombie epidemic that ravages the entire world. I am not a Brad Pitt hater, but I had a feeling this film would be 95% centered around him and had my doubts. It is still 95% focused on the Pitt, but he really sells the fear, the action, the emotion and the fortitude one would expect to see from a character in his position.

Is this the kitchen from Resident Evil? :)

Is this the kitchen from Resident Evil? 🙂

One of the things that got me with World War Z was how quickly it just jumps into the story. You’ll understand when you see it. The film transforms its appearance from that of a family film to a Resident Evil survivor film just about as quickly as the turning of the zombies themselves. I also couldn’t help thinking that the events of World War Z must have been what was going on in the world while Rick was in that coma in The Walking Dead. 🙂

The real world response of such a pandemic is what enables to film to lock in on the fear factor of the brain. So many moments of intense squirming in your chair will keep the attention as characters here and there scramble for their lives from uncertain doom. The science involved in the story really brings in the plausibility factor to ground level, but also ushers in the predictability that keeps World War Z‘s surprise factor at bay. It may make you squirm and shriek, but the anti-climatic may make you more upset, unfortunately.wwz2

Perhaps a result of so many productions problems, rewrites and reshoots, but the way in which it all ties together is too neat. Much like the alternate ending of I Am Legend (for which I am glad it remained the alternate ending), World War Z ends in a way that is set up and expected. The road there is tumultuous but through it all, we care little to nothing for any of the characters they spend time to introduce us to (not even his family, really) which makes the time spent to do so seem a bit wasted as it could’ve been spent on the zombies rampage then and explaining a bit more about them (We’ll chalk it up to poor editing given the post-production issues).Brad Pitt in World War Z

I did miss a little bit of the terrifying zombie violence that is seen in The Walking Dead, Quarantine and other such films. Perhaps the PG-13 rating hurt this film, but ultimately it is not a horrible movie and I was pleasantly surprised. A criticism this film is receiving is the lack of the themes present in the book (geopolitical, religious, environmental, etc). While not everything can be input into a film, I can understand where that may have strengthened the story. However, this is a zombie movie. And as such, the biggest criticism I can give it is that it didn’t give enough of them. (Minus a few creepy scenes, I expected more)wwz3

World War Z: Brad Pitt’s career isn’t as dead yet as the zombies he was fighting. Check it out.

My Score: out of 5 stars for World War Z

(Remember, to read this review of mine and over 250 more, check out THE ARCHIVE of movies I have reviewed anytime. Know before you go…or rent…or buy!)

———-

Thanks for reading! Happy Watching!

T, The Focused Filmographer

up next: Review of The Iceman

Advertisements
13 Comments leave one →
  1. June 22, 2013 4:16 pm

    I was hesitant to watch it–but now I am leaning on checking it out because I am getting curious. 😀

    Great review! Later!

    Like

    • June 25, 2013 6:54 pm

      It’s a good middle-of-the-road thriller. Far from a horror flick (which, arguably, every zombie flick should be horror). Let me know what you think!

      Like

  2. June 22, 2013 9:02 pm

    Yup. 3 out of 5 is about right, the PG13 rating DID hurt it, and the ending WILL upset people.

    I totally have your back on this one, T. 😉

    Like

    • June 25, 2013 6:57 pm

      Yeah. I was like “WhAATTT?! We’re really getting this ending that we saw coming from the beginning?! BOOO!” haha

      did you see the original proposed, and much bleaker, ending? I liked it more…and it explained Matthew Fox’s useless character.
      http://www.cinemablend.com/new/How-World-War-Z-Originally-Ended-What-Happened-Matthew-Fox-38192.html

      Like

  3. June 23, 2013 9:08 am

    The direction is solid, but the script blows and really ruins the movie in the end. Nice review T.

    Like

    • June 25, 2013 7:01 pm

      yep. the ending was a ruin for me too. I am curious where they will go with the sequel. Thanks for the comment Dan.

      Like

  4. Ted S. permalink
    June 23, 2013 4:32 pm

    3 out 5 stars is my score too, I thought the first half was excellent and I appreciate they included a few sequences that happened in the book even though the film is nothing like the book. It’s quite obvious that the second was changed, it went from an action/adventure to suspense/thriller. That changed in tone really ruined the film for me. I think had stick with the original ending, the film would’ve been a lot better. And also the lack of blood and gore bugged the heck out of me, especially that scene where Pitt chopped off that soldier’s hand off.

    Like

    • June 25, 2013 7:19 pm

      RIGHT!! the soldier hand part was so ridiculous! ha.

      The Walking Dead was better in special effects and scariness than this movie. sadly. I really wonder why they felt they had to hold some of the creepiness at bay.

      oh well. another movie based on a book that comes nowhere near being as good as the book

      Like

  5. Anonymous permalink
    June 24, 2013 10:50 pm

    Maybe I will wait to Netflix it then

    Like

    • June 25, 2013 7:19 pm

      Not a bad idea, truthfully

      Like

Trackbacks

  1. World War Z Review: Citizen Zeke | Rorschach Reviews
  2. » Movie Review – Resident Evil: Retribution Fernby Films
  3. » Movie Review – Returned, The (2013) Fernby Films

Psst!! Join in! Leave a Comment!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: